End Citizens United Plays The Long Game

The republican party has apparently been given a leg up in the outset of the 2010 Citizens United case. The case pitching conservative group Citizens United against he Federal Elections Commission concluded in a tight 5-4 ruling in Citizens United’s favor. Like Roe vs. Wade, Dred Scot vs. Sanford, or Brown vs. Board of Education the ruling could greatly impact the future. The question political parities currently argue over is whether that is a good thing.

The main problem with the Supreme Court ruling is that it opens the door for unlimited political contributions for corporations. The ruling effectively widens the coverage of free speech past the individual and onto the corporation. This means companies can allocate money to campaign finance without identifying themselves, using the contributions to swing legislation their way. Justice Stevens, who was a no vote, claimed that the ruling hinders the democracy’s ability to function. He is not alone in this sentiment.

Many politicians are standing against the ruling, most of them hailing from the left side of the political spectrum. They warn of the dangers and advocate legislation to stop the ruling in its tracks. As the Supreme Court is the highest court stateside the only way to countermand the decision is through legislation. PAC organizations support it, but one in particular is putting its money where its mouth is.

End Citizens United is funding democratic elections in hopes of stacking the deck with advocates against Citizens United. Advocates who will use their political stations to put legislation in place to amend the first amendment. It will take some doing to get the ball rolling, and even more to ratify the amendment, but on the outset it will stop Citizens United it is tracks. Simply put, the first amendment will gain specific interpretation that free speech pertains only to the individual.

End Citizens United as formed back in 2015, and is a very active PAC. Led by a solid group of veterans, each with a decade of political experience in their belts, End Citizens United uses grassroots funding to support its candidates. As most opposition comes from the left, the candidates are primarily Democrat. End Citizens United is run by president and executive director Tiffany Muller, who served as chief of staff to two congressmen. Her executive vice president is Matt Burgess, a campaign expert. The PAC raised $25 million dollars in 2016.

End Citizens United Praises Senator Gillibrand’s Choice To Stop Receiving Money From Corporate PACs

It is no secret that transparency and accountability are key ingredients that are vital to the success of democracy. The people who cast the ballots that allow a politician to win an election deserve to have elected representatives who are open about their activities and to answer to the people who put them in power in the first place. At its best democracy is intended to be an on-going dialogue and collective project that constituents and elected officials engage in together.

In an ideal situation constituents are able to voice the concerns that they have about economic, social and political aspects of their communities that come under a politician’s purview and a politician is supposed to listen to these concerns and use the power that they have as a member of a legislative body or as a government official to address those concerns in a way that is amenable to the community according to politifact.com. In a healthy democracy this is how the relationship between an elected official and their constituents is intended to function however there have been some important developments in our political system that have caused this arrangement to go awry. One of these developments is a high profile Supreme Court case that is known as Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission.

Read more: Democratic PAC End Citizens United names ‘Big Money 20’ targets for 2018

The court case, which is often referred to colloquially merely as Citizens United, arguably harmed the integrity of the electoral process by weakening laws that were meant to protect it. One of the most disastrous outcomes of the Supreme Court ruling on Citizens United was the fact that it allowed large amounts of political contributions to flow into the campaign process from sources such as corporations and labor unions. The problems that arise from this are the fact that corporations are far more likely to have access to more resources and money that they can funnel towards the candidate of their choice through an organization that is known as a Super political action committee.

The campaign finance laws that were in place prior to the institution of the new rules ushered in by the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission case placed limitations on the kinds of organizations that could contribute to the political campaigns of candidates who were running for office. The older campaign finance laws also placed much-needed restrictions on the amount of money that individuals could contribute to political campaigns. Fortunately a group that is called End Citizens United is making efforts to roll back the damage that the Citizens United case has caused to the political system. End Citizen’s United highlighted a story by the news publication Buzzfeed about a decision made by New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand with regard to donations from corporate PACs. In January of 2018 Senator Kirsten Gillibrand stopped receiving donations from corporate PACs according to End Citizens United.

Dick DeVos And His Family’s Example

Dick DeVos is an entrepreneur from a family of entrepreneurs. Therefore, it is very likely that he has learned a lot about business at a very young age, especially since he was involved with Amway when it was first started. His father has taught him through example how to run a business. Dick DeVos has carried his lessons that he has learned through his career. With all of the businesses he has run, he has gained enough experience and insights to share with others that are hoping to run successful companies. These are not his only accomplishments. Learn more: http://www.dbdvfoundation.org/about

 

Dick is also a philanthropist when it comes to his activities. He is willing to share a lot of his resources with his community. His way of helping the community involves the long term as well as the short term. He does not want people to become dependent on the help that they get. Instead, he gives people a path to follow that can help them in the long run. Dick and his wife has set up the Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation as a way to fund different programs of the community so that they can provide the best possible education to the children.

 

As a family man, Dick DeVos makes sure that he presents himself as a strong and wise person. He takes care of all of the responsibilities in his home and also teaches his family the principles that will help them stay prosperous. These principles are helpful in every aspect of life. One principle is honesty. One of the reasons that honesty is such a great principle is that it allows people to move forward without having to fear any consequences.

 

People who are looking for an example of success and philanthropy have to look no further than the DeVos Family. They are the type of people that are not only good at acquire resources, but are willing to use their resources to help others. The help they provide is actually meaningful and empowering. They help the community by providing opportunities that are sustainable and teaching people how to create their own opportunities.

End Citizens United Raises 4 Million Dollars From Donations And Plans To Raise 35 Million More

In 2010, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the case of Citizens United v. F.E.C that has had negative impacts on the American election system. Essentially, the ruling – popularly referred to as Citizens United – has allowed corporations, generous individuals, and special interest groups to spend an unlimited and untraceable amount of money funding U.S elections. This has effectively killed transparency in campaign financing and gives these donors an opportunity to shift political power in their favor.

 

However, skeptics question whether Citizens United has had any demonstrable effects on campaigns in America. A recently released study from the Brennan Center for Justice showed that this is indeed the case. In 2014Senate elections, spending by outside donors rose up to 486 million dollars, more than double what was spent in 2010.

 

End Citizens United is a political action group formed in 2015 to reform campaign finance. They hope to do this in two ways: by pushing for a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United, and by getting like-minded Democratic politicians elected. End Citizens United is funded mainly by grassroots individual donors. Because of its commitment to making political spending more transparent, the group’s annual Federal Elections Commission filings are available to the public on their website.

 

From its inception, End Citizens United has been raising huge amounts of money to pour into achieving their objectives. In its first year of operation, the group managed to raise 11 million dollars. Now they have raised 4 million dollars in the first three months of 2017, and expect to hit the 35 million dollar mark in time for the Congressional midterms that will be held in 2018.

 

Of the 100,000 people who contributed to End Citizens United in this first quarter, around 40,000 were first-time donors. The average donation received by the group this year was 12 dollars. As a traditional political action committee, End Citizens United cannot receive more than 5,000 dollars in donations from an individual. In spite of this limit, the group has become one of the top-spending groups aligned to the Democratic party.

 

While reporting this achievement, the PAC’s Executive Director Tiffany Muller said the goal for the midterms is to ensure pro-election finance reform politicians were elected to Congress. The first such candidate the PAC is urging its supporters to elect Jon Ossoff, a first-time Congressional candidate from Georgia. Ossoff surprised established politicians by raising about 4 million dollars for the special election to be held on April 18. This election will be to fill a seat in the house left vacant after Republican Tom Price was appointed to a position within the Trump administration.

 

End Citizens United was at the forefront of this effort, encouraging their supporters to contribute 500,000 dollars to Ossoff’s campaign. Muller says that the PAC is still analyzing the races that will be active in the 2018 elections. However, they will likely defend Democratic Senators Jon Tester from Montana, and Sherrod Brown from Ohio.